Search
Close this search box.

Article

Fast Urban Growth, Human Psycho-Socio-Ecological Needs and ‘Enactivisim’: The Future of Cities

SPACE International Journal of Space Studies in Architecture and Urban Design
Volume: 1
Issue: 1
Natalia Olszewska
The Center of Conscious Design, London, UK; Impronta, Bergamo, Italy
Nour Tawil
Environmental Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Human Development / IMPRS on the Life Course, Berlin, Germany
https://doi.org/10.51596/sjp2020.aulf1170
Received October 1, 2020 – Accepted November 2, 2020 – Published December 2, 2020
Abstract

It has been projected that in three decades, two-thirds of the global population will become city dwellers, compared to 50 per cent today. Many urban concepts and planning principles have been generated to tackle the consequential challenges. Furthermore, there has been a noticeable paradigm shift towards psychological sustainability, with some theories indicating a link between the fulfilment of needs and ecological sustainability. Moreover, it has been previously stressed that environments play an important role in fulfilling peoples psychological needs. The current urban sustainable models provide solutions oriented towards physical and environmental aspects. But they lack a systematic understanding of human-environment interactions, therefore, neglect important cognitive and behavioural aspects. We argue that this misalignment between urban contexts and human needs and behaviour could be addressed if architectural and urban design started to be informed by neuroscience. This paper aims to emphasize the foundations of the neuroscience-informed design approach.

Keywords
Urban design, human needs, psycho-social sustainability, neuroscience-informed design, enactivisim
Restricted Content This article is restricted. You can purchase access to the individual article or access all articles using a membership with a subscription.

Individual with Journal Subscription

£450.00 per Year.

Select

Access to conference registration
Access to Journal subscription

Free - Student with Journal Subscription

£380.00 per Year.

Select

Access to conference registration. Proof of student eligibility required.
Access to Journal subscription.

Free-Individual with Journal subscription.

£410.00 per Year.

Select

Discounts on conference registrations, SPACE shop and e-journals. Access to members only areas on the website.
Access to Journal subscription.

Student with Journal subscription.

£400.00 per Year.

Select

Student priced discounts on conference registrations, SPACE shop and e-journals. Access to members only areas on the website. Proof of student eligibility required.
Access to Journal subscription.

 
Endnotes

This paper has been presented at the Conference “AGORA CAUMME 2020 – Mediterranean: Between Expansion and Regeneration” and selected by the Conference Scientific Committee to be published in the SPACE International Journal of Space Studies in Architecture and Urban Design. Peer review under the responsibility of the scientific committee of AGORA CAUMME 2020.

References

Ben-Eli, M. (2015). Sustainability: Definition and five core principles a new framework the sustainability laboratory New York, NY. http://www.sustainabilitylabs.org/assets/img/SL5CorePrinciples.pdf

Boström, M. (2012). The problematic social dimension of sustainable development: the case of the Forest Stewardship Council, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 19(1), 3-15. DOI: 10.1080/13504509.2011.582891

Camargo, A., Artus, J., and Spears, H. (2018). Neuroscience for cities playbook. Accessed October 17, 2018.

https://futurecities.catapult.org.uk/project/neuroscience-for-citiesa-playbook/

Coburn, A., Vartanian, O., Chatterjee, A. (2017). Buildings, Beauty, and the Brain: A Neuroscience of Architectural Experience. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29, 1521-1531. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01146

Di Fabio, A., & Rosen, M. A. (2018). Opening the Black Box of Psychological Processes in the Science of Sustainable Development: A New Frontier. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 2(4). DOI: 10.20897/ejosdr/3933

Ehrenfeld, J. (2009). Sustainability by Design. A Subversive Strategy for Transforming our Consumer Culture. Yale University Press. ISBN: 9780300137491

Ellard, C.G. (2018). The Psychogeography of Urban Form: Building and Measuring Baukultur. Intertwining Magazine: Unfolding Art and Science.

Ellard, C.G, Shaughnessy, S.C. (2003). A comparison of visual and nonvisual sensory inputs to walked distance in a blind-walking task. Perception, 32(5), 567-78. DOI: 10.1068/p5041

Gibson, J.J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston. ISBN:
9780898599596

Goldhagen, S. W. (2017). Welcome to your world: how the built environment shapes our lives. First edition. New York, NY: Harper, an imprint of HarperCollinsPublishers. P. 275. ISBN: 9781538412718

Grimm, N.B., Faeth, S.H., Golubiewski, N. E., Redman, C.L., Wu, J.G., Bai, X.M., Briggs, J.M. (2008). Global change and the ecology of cities. Science, 319 (2008), 756-760. DOI: 10.1126/science.1150195

Karimi, K. (2018). Space syntax: consolidation and transformation of an urban research field. Journal of Urban Design, 23(1), 1-4. DOI: 10.1080/13574809.2018.1403177

Kasser, T. (2002). The high price of materialism. MIT Press.

Kasser, T. (2009). Psychological Need Satisfaction, Personal Well-Being, and Ecological Sustainability. Ecopsychology, 1(4):175-180. DOI: 10.1089/eco.2009.0025

King, M.C., Dillard, J., Dujon, V., (Eds), (2008). Understanding the Social Dimension of Sustainability. Routledge https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203892978

Kiverstein, J., & Miller, M. (2015). The embodied brain: Towards a radical embodied cognitive neuroscience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(237). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00237

Krefis, A.C., Augustin, M., Schlünzen, K.H., Oßenbrügge, J., Augustin, J. (2018). How does the Urban Environment affect health and well-being? A systematic Review. Urban Sci., 2(21). DOI: 10.3390/urbansci2010021

Laguna, J.M. (2014). Institutional Politics, Power Constellations, and Urban Social Sustainability: A Comparative-Historical Analysis. PhD Dissertation. The Florida State University College of Social Sciences and Public Policy. Retrieved from http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-9022

Landorf, C. (2011). Evaluating social sustainability in historic urban environments. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 17(5), 463-477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2011.563788

Littig, B., & Griessler, E. (2005). Social sustainability: a catchword between political pragmatism and social theory. International Journal of Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, 8(1/2), 65-79.

Mallgrave H. F. (2011). The Architect’s Brain: Neuroscience, Creativity, and Architecture. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-1-405-19585-0

Manzi, T., Lucas, K., Lloyd-Jones, T., Allen, J. (2010). Understanding social sustainability: key concepts and developments in theory and practice. In: Manzi, T., Lucas, K., Lloyd-Jones, T. and Allen, J. (ed.), Social sustainability in urban areas: communities, connectivity, and the urban fabric. Earthscan, London, UK. ISBN: 9781844076741

Marcus, L. (2015). Ecological space and cognitive geometry: Linking humans and environment in space syntax theory. In Proceedings of the 10th International Space Syntax Symposium, UCL, London. http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/230395/local_230395.pdf

Marcus, L.H., Giusti, M., Barthel, S. (2016). Cognitive affordances in sustainable urbanism: contributions of space synthax and spatial cognition. Journal of Urban Design, 21(4), 1-14. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2016.1184565

Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality (1st ed.). Harper, New York. ISBN:
9780060419875

McNeill, L.H., Kreuter, M.W., Subramanian, S.V. (2006). Social environment and physical activity: a review of concepts and evidence. Soc Sci Med 2006; 63(4), 10111022.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.03.012

Mehan, A., Soflaei, F. (2017). Social Sustainability in Urban Context: Concepts, Definitions and Principles. In book: Architectural Research Addressing Societal Challenges: Proceedings of the EAAE ARCC 10th International Conference (EAAE ARCC 2016), 15-18 June 2016, Lisbon, Portugal. Edition: First Edition, Vol 1. Chapter: Social Sustainability in Urban Context: Concepts, Definitions and Principles. Publisher: CRC Press by Taylor and Francis Group. Editors: Manuel Jorge Rodrigues Couceiro da Costa, Filipa Roseta, Joana Pestana Lages, Susana Couceiro da Costa.

Penn, A. (2020). Keynote lecture at the Academy of Neuroscience for Architecture Biennial Conference.

Putnam RD. (2004). Education, Diversity, Social Cohesion and ‘Social Capital’. Dublin, Ireland: OECD Education Ministers.

Pykett, J., Osborne, T., Resch, B. (2020): From Urban Stress to Neurourbanism: How Should We Research City Well-Being? Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1736982

Raeisi, I., Kharazmi Nezhad, A., Hafezifar, M. (2010). Architectural Design Principles of Public Spaces Based on Social Sustainability Approach: A Case Study in Ardabil. Design Principles and Practices, 4(5), 99-113. DOI: 10.18848/1833-1874/CGP/v04i05/37968

Robbins, P., & Aydede, M., (Eds.), (2009).  The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition (Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816826

Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 6878. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Sheldon, K. M., Elliot, A. J., Kim, Y., & Kasser, T. (2001). What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(2), 325339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.325

Sussman, A., & Hollander, J. B. (2015). Cognitive architecture: Designing for how we respond to the built environment. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. ISBN: 9780415724692

Thomas, C. F. (2015). Naturalizing Sustainability Discourse: Paradigm, Practices and Pedagogy of Thoreau, Leopold, Carson and Wilson: PhD. Thesis: Arizona State University.

United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 2018. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision, Methodology. https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2018-Report.pdf

US Institute of Medicine (2003). The Future of the Publics Health in the 21st Century. National Academies Press.

Valtchanov., D., Barton, K., Ellard, C.G. (2010). Restorative Effects of Virtual Nature Settings. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 13(5), 503-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0308

Valtchanov, D., & Ellard, C.G. (2015). Cognitive and affective responses to natural scenes: Effects of low level visual properties on preference, cognitive load and eye movements. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 184-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.07.001

Varela, F.J., Thompson, E., Rosch, E. (1992). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262529365.001.0001

Vlahov, D., Galea, S. (2003). Urban health: a new discipline. Lancet, 362 (2003), 1091-1092. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14499-6

Editors Introduction (2017). Psycho-social Bases of Sustainable Development. Psychology and Developing Societies, 29(2), vii–ix. DOI: 10.1177/0971333617721760

Web References

[1] https://spacesyntax.com/project/waterloo-south-bank/

[2] https://www.thecentriclab.com/

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Biographical Notes on Contributors

Natalia Olszewska

Nour Tawil

 

Sign in to continue

Not a member yet? Sign up now